Mouchette

So this website, Mouchette, is rather odd. It's 'out there' in terms of websites. I'm not really sure what the purpose is, but the visual and audio make me question the purpose and intention of the creator. In my opinion, I don't think there is a purpose of this website. Although the website says a 13-year old girl created this website, I don't believe it (Later to find out, her artwork is in an art gallery in Japan--> not a real identity. So that leads me to ask why does she want our own identity if she's using a fake one?). 

The flash media throughout the website requires a wealth of knowledge and then there are frequent sexual references throughout the website. I just don't see a 13 year old creating this. In our class discussion her age came up- is 'she' just a character/online identity? Probably.

The colors and images that Mouchette uses is rather old-looking. It reminds me of my first computer, a Windows 90 (?). It's very interactive and uses flash but doesn't seem to match my understanding of modern internet usage. 

It's also interesting because she frequently asks for your information- your email, your name, etc. Why does this anonymous person need this information? She also discusses 'sensitive' topics like suicide and asks the viewer what the best way to kill yourself if you're under 13.

Some pages, like Blind Shells, reminds me of jodi, which we discussed last week. It's rather random and the viewer is able to choose what and how they view something, It's interesting how both Mouchette and Jodi give the viewer control on what they see on a specific website. It's making the viewer and active viewer rather than a passive viewer.

This website is controversial because it looks at rather tough subjects in a light way. The creator doesn't seem to care about suicide, sex, or death and how people emotionally react to them. The creator looks at these with an odd-outlook and doesn't seem to take these matters seriously, which I think hurts the overall website. 

My Online Identities

I have about five or six online identities- Facebook, Twitter, my Hong Kong Blog, this blog, another personal blog, and my 'lurker' identity. As I was discussing with my classmates, my Facebook page is the closest identity to my real-person identity. I'm not sure why, but I am able to share/more willing to share more things on Facebook than on other sites).

My Twitter account is rather a mix of my different accounts- I tweet about some daily occurrences about my time in Hong Kong, sometimes I update about crew (when I'm at HWS) and sometimes I tweet about other random things.  

My Hong Kong blog is catered to talk about my experiences during my semester abroad in Hong Kong- I try and focus on the details and descriptions of my experiences so those at home are able to understand my daily happenings.  

As I am sure you can already tell, this class blog focuses on things that relate to class. You won't find things about my personal life but you will find my opinions about digital media here. The writings here are mainly academic and for academic purposes even though they do incorporate social media.

My other personal blog is basically for my own purposes, rants and raves. Nobody knows about it or reads it, but it is out there on the Internet. It has a focus but I rarely update it- usually once every month. If it's found, it's found, but I haven't really given the link out like I have with my Hong Kong blog.

My final online identity is what I call a 'lurker.' As a lurker I read blogs but never comment or participate in them. There are about 6-8 blogs that I read daily and have for over a year, but I have never commented on them. I like to sit back and read about their lives and continue with my own. Since I don't have a blog that they can comment back on I feel like if I were to comment, it'd be a one-way conversation (even though it isn't, but that's another story) so I am not inclined to comment. Maybe if I ever release my other personal blog or create another blog then I might leave my 'lurker' status behind, but only time will tell.

Constructing Identity Online

Key Quotes (at least 5):

"After the arduous task of constructing your aesthetically pleasing and accurate chuck of the ‘net, you have to be diligent enough to keep it updated frequently.  Old information that is no longer of interest to your target group can drastically impact how you and your online identity are received by the public: you will look like a lazy vagabond if you simply dump a truck load of pertinent personal information on your site, but never update it for months at a time.  Band profiles are perfect examples of why this is important.  If someone visits a band profile and samples some of their tunes, they will most likely come back every once and a while to see if something new has been uploaded.  Obviously, if fresh, new content, isn’t always being provided, the listener will most likely lose interest and start frequenting a different band’s profile (one who is on top of things and releases new tracks once a month)." (Ryan Passey, http://www.pcmech.com/article/construct-your-online-identity-carefully/)

"While physical constraints such as the body, biological sex, race, or age can have a profound effect on self-definition and self-presentation (Collins & Kuczaj, 1991), many of these attributes become flexible in online environments. In a virtual world, one even gets to construct one's body. The anonymity afforded to youth within virtual worlds allows adolescents more flexibility in exploring their identity through their language, their role play, and the personae they assume" ( David A. Huffaker and Sandra L. Calvert http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html) 

"Sometimes referred to as netspeak, the language of the Internet entails both traditional linguistic forms and adapted ones that include slang and non-standard forms that are sometimes used in offline life. Netspeak is an emergent discourse that is shaped entirely by the creativity of its community (Crystal, 2001). The introduction of acronyms (e.g., "lol = laugh out loud," "brb = be right back"), plays or variations on words (e.g., "cya = see you", "latah = later"), graphical icons that represent emotions, called emoticons (e.g., :) or ;-{} ) or graphical icons that represent a real person in a virtual context, called avatars, are all examples of language produced by online communicators. This language continues to evolve and remains an important area of study when considering the ways in which Internet users interact and express who they are" ( David A. Huffaker and Sandra L. Calvert http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html) 

"In everyday terms the argument is that children are largely defined by the significant adults in their life, but in adolescence they have to make a series of self-defining choices to allow them to function as autonomous adults."Working with Adolescents: Constructing Identity. Contributors: John Head - author. Publisher: Falmer Press. Place of Publication: London. Publication Year: 1997. Page Number: 7.http://www.questia.com/read/103388342?title=Chapter%202%3a%20Acquiring%20a%20Sense%20of%20Identity). 

Key Links:

Constructing Identity and Community Online: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=727231961&Fmt=7&clientId=25836&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Online Social Networking on Campus: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/01/08/network

Key Books and Articles:  

Online Communication: Linking Technology, Identity and Culture by Andrw Wood

Online Social Networking on Campus: Understanding what Matters in Student Culture by Ana M. Martinez Aleman and Katherine Lynk Wartman

 

Youth, Identity and Digital Media edited by David Buckingham

Case Study

Who is the artist/maker of the artwork/website/game?

What is its name?

When was it produced/released?

Describe it in detail

What is interesting/unusual/thought-rpovoking/aesthetically pleasing/puzzling about this artwork/website/game?

What are key issues or questions does this artwork/website/game raise?

Creative Culture

Do you remember the days when you had to do a presentation for school or work relying on just Powerpoint? And how boring they were? Youtube didn’t exist so you couldn’t rely on an outside video to further emphasize your point or entertain your audience. Since it’s establishment, Youtube and other video-sharing sites have enhanced creative culture. Video-sharing sites have added a new level to creative culture. They’ve changed the way we look at videos and video making and give everybody the chance to be a filmmaker; they are allowing everyday humans to create videos on topics they are interested in and share them with the rest of the world.

As Marek argues in “Creativity meets Circulation: Internet, amateurs and the process of evolution,” there are different types of users with different aims, professionals and amateurs; “The professional user can be an institution or an individual. The crucial distinction is that a professional user acts strategically. This means that a professional user publishes a video in order to achieve a certain goal - mostly a commercial one” (Marek 2). Despite the different aims, both professionals and amateurs aim to show their video to the world; they want to share their creative culture. Youtube and other video-sharing sites have also created a new platform for video makers, Marek argues; “a small but nonetheless very important group of users that is somehow located between the group of professionals and the group of amateurs, the so called Internet-celebrities, i.e. individuals that have gained a great reputation within the Internet community” (Marek 3). These Internet celebrities use their creativity to enhance the creative culture of the world. Internet celebrities like Chris Crocker (‘Leave Britney Alone’) and the creator of the Potter Puppet Pals series take a pop culture phenomenon and use their own creativity to shed the subject in a different light. Without Youtube or other video-sharing sites, we would not have seen these different viewpoints.

Video sharing sites like Youtube enhance creative culture. They offer a free platform for human beings to visually and audibly voice their point of view. Without these sites we would still be restricted to words, and although words are powerful, sometimes watching a video can get a point across a larger audience better- actions speak louder than words. 

'Leave Britney Alone"

Chris Crocker’s Youtube video, “Leave Britney Alone’ has become a Youtube phenomena. Although he is just sitting in front of a sheet or curtain emotionally voicing his opinions, it has received more than 34 million views (34, 259, 989 to be exact as of October 10, 2010) since being published on September 7, 2007. Crocker’s simple video yet intriguing execution and insightful message and has allured viewers for more than 3 years.

The video itself is of rather low quality. It is evident that he is sitting in front of the camera, or even possibly holding the camera with his hand and recording this. There is very little to no physical movement, except wiping his tears; the background, a sheet is very plain and bland. But did Crocker plan this simple set so the viewer would focus on his message, to leave Britney alone? With very little overall movement, the viewer is able to focus on Crocker’s emotion and narrative. Crocker’s emotions provide more insight to his message than the background and setting; there are no light changes to distract the viewer’s eye to something else; the viewer is focused on Crocker.

The narrative itself can be seen as powerful. It entices the audience to listen to his concerns for Britney Spears, as the life of Britney Spears is one that has been followed by the mass media for years; the whole world is watching and critiquing every step she takes. In addition, Crocker raises some interesting socio-cultural issues. Although he is mainly concerned with giving Britney her necessary space for recovery, it raises the question of privacy and celebrity status. Although a celebrity is a human being and has the same right to privacy, he/she lives in the limelight and we as ‘viewers’ or non-celebrity status human beings are intrigued by their rich lifestyles. Where do we draw the line for celebrities? Why are we so intrigued in their lifestyle? Why are we willing to pay money to read or watch about their daily habits? Why are we so willing to spend time following celebrities around when there are homeless people starving on the street? Why give out money to celebrities or media outlets that take advantage of celebrities when they already have enough money?

The attention the ‘Leave Britney Alone’ video has received from the media is rightfully earned. It goes to show that many human beings acknowledge our love and intrigue for information about celebrities is way too intense and we must draw a line somewhere in terms of respecting privacy, but we are hesitant to do so. With so many views, I wonder how this will, if it does at all, affect Lindsay Lohan’s current personal troubles. Currently going through some rough waters, Lohan probably also needs to be out of the limelight and media; the question though, is will she? Will our desire for information about her life and the money we are willing to spend on it triumph her need for privacy?